Why Can’t the Church Ordain Women Priests?


“It’s a strange idea that the only way to truly respect and honor women is to expect them to be more like men. That seems like you’re just honoring men and masculinity.”

Watch Brian Holdsworth’s video commentary on his thoughts of dealing with finding himself disagreeing with the Pope…


Our ancestors understood that men and women have distinct qualities so they tried to define roles and conventions that were best suited to the strengths of each.

So, it might be true to say that traditional gender roles are societal conventions, but what’s being left out of that is that they are conventions that are an attempt, admittedly imperfect, to reflect objective, biological, and maybe even, spiritual, realities.

So how well suited those roles fit that reality is something that we should be routinely improving so that they better reflect what is true. But instead, what we’ve done is identified one side of that equation, specifically men’s, as being far more desirable then the role of women in society and that if women want to be equal, they should simply expect all the same privileges and responsibilities of men.

It’s a strange idea that the only way to truly respect and honor women is to expect them to be more like men. That seems like your just honoring men and masculinity to me.

I think it’s a really juvenile thing to say that two distinct things, or people, in this case, cannot be equal unless they are the same in every way. I think a better solution would be to recognize and celebrate the qualities that make women distinct from men.

So let’s bring this back to the conversation around the Catholic priesthood. The first thing I’d say is that I think this conversation has fallen prey to many of the same things I described earlier. Because the Catholic Priesthood is something that has always been exclusively performed by men, we’ve surrendered to this idea that it’s a desirable and glamorous role that women should be allowed to do as well.

All the while, we’re forgetting that it is a role of tremendous sacrifice.

Not surprisingly, the factions campaigning for women priests are also campaigning for the abolition of celibacy because they want all the honor and not the sacrifice.

When Pope Francis was asked about this, he responded by saying that this was symptomatic of a kind of clericalism and I think he’s right. It’s a clericalism that puts priests on a pedestal and then creates an unhealthy appetite for wanting to be on that pedestal yourself… and for the wrong reasons.

There’s also the question of what God or Christ wants for his Church. Jesus, in establishing his Church chose 12 men, exclusively, to be apostles. That doesn’t mean that women didn’t have spiritual roles but it did mean that, whatever it meant to be an apostle, was a role for men.

But the factions who want the Church to ordain women do have their rationalizations for why Jesus did what he did.

They say that Jesus chose men because he was succumbing to societal conventions. There’s nothing about the character of Jesus that suggests he would be motivated by fear of upsetting the customs and traditions of men. He routinely affiliated with outcasts, lepers, and he relentlessly criticized the religious elders of his day. So much so that they eventually conspired to have him executed.

The second problem with that line of reasoning is that it includes the belief that restricting certain roles to men is sexist and sexism is wrong.

If that’s how you define sexism and if, according to that definition, it’s a moral wrong, then you, necessarily have to admit that it’s a sin and Jesus committed it.

And if Jesus committed a sin, then he could not have been God incarnate, God who is goodness itself, and if Jesus wasn’t God incarnate, then there’s no point in having a Church or priests… or any of it.

Lastly I want to address the point that we keep hearing that if women can’t be priests, then we need to make sure that we give them more prominence and influence in the Church – and by that, we mean that they should be sitting on more theological commissions, or governance boards, or committees, etc.

If there are women who want to have those roles and are qualified and ready, then great.

But when we talk about the Church, as in women need more influence in the Church, what do we mean by, the Church? Well, the Church means God’s people. So, influence over the Church is synonymous with influence over God’s people.

Well, the thing I’d say to that, is that traditionally, women already had the MOST influential role in the Church. Nothing is more influential than motherhood. To have the most exclusive access to children at their most critical stages of development is more influence than you can ask for. There are no theological papers, encyclicals, or magisterial exhortations that compare to the mentoring of a child by their mother.

Get our inspiring content delivered to your inbox every morning - FREE!


  1. Thank you for speaking on this topic. Excluding women from the priesthood and vocal roles is the Church’s loss, and it a big loss. When the only interpretations of the Bible are by men, and in by particular a select group of men, valuable perspectives are lost and large segments of the population are alienated.

  2. Thank you for speaking on this topic. Excluding women from the priesthood and vocal roles is the Church’s loss, and it a big loss. When the only interpretations of the Bible are by men, and in by particular a select group of men, valuable perspectives are lost and large segments of the population are alienated.

  3. Is there evidence that the same groups lobbying for women in the priesthood are looking to end the bonds of celibacy? That has not been my, albeit limited, experience of the conversation. Those I’ve met who argue for women priests often talk about how it is one way to address the priest shortage without moving into a situation where a parish must financially support a married priest’s family. A celibate woman will have more energy to focus on pastoring a flock than will a married priest, especially as he and his wife raise children, they argue. That’s very different from saying that the Church should invite both women and married people to be priests.

    Finally, while I agree with your point that women have a unique and vital role in raising children into the faith, you seem to give short shrift to fathers as the rightful heads of families. A father leads his wife and children as God leads the Church. When arguing that women have a distinct and holy role as mothers, please acknowledge the sacred and vital role that married men have as fathers. Celibate male priests are called to shepherd their parishes the way that fathers are called to shepherd their families. By saying that motherhood is a special kind of analog to the priesthood, you omit the precious role of fatherhood, which often seems to be under attack in modern society.

  4. I don’t believe women want to become more like men. I think they love the Lord and have an interest in the same things that some men.

    The also hate how a few Catholic people try to make the word feminist as offensive. If it weren’t for women suffragists- women still wouldn’t be able to drive, vote, continuing their education, serve wine for communion, and so much more.

    There are obviously differences in men and women. It doesn’t mean there’s something wrong if both sexes of people are interested in the same things.

    • If women love the Lord, believe Catholicism holds the fullness of truth, then I suggest reading what the Catechism says addressing this point. Priesthood is the role of men, and women at not to strive for it. I am a woman who believes in the Triune implicitly, and I shudder at questioning the training received. We are God’s creation, as is the doctrine. Support God’s teachings please!

  5. Be careful, this would open up a new “can of worms” for your church. Just look at the churches with them.

  6. Great job as usual. I read some comments and a couple of thing’s. To say Jesus was a product of the times is crazy. Women and children were nothing more than property and because of Jesus he diginified them. Also to say Jesus our all knowing God did not have enough insight to include women amounst his apostles is ridiculous yet u believe he did ever thing else, really? Lastly if Jesus had wanted women to be priests, who better to have then his own mother? So if he didnt include his mother, then he must of know what he was doing!

  7. I was taught my catholic faith by beautiful NUNS at catholic school. I learned more from them about my faith than any priest’s homily (which are too often boring). I believe, given the problem of sexual abuse by male priests, perhaps females would be a better choice for the priesthood.

  8. One of the early Fathers of the Church said that our greatest weakness is that we want to serve God, but on our terms. I think that we continually try to create a religion that feels good to us. Jesus Christ was, is , and will always be God; He didn’t make mistakes. He is a man and men are built to serve, that’s why He washed the feet of the Apostles so they, and their successors, would be our preeminent servants. Also, the Church is truly a feminine entity; our Lord’s bride. When a man becomes a priest he actually marries the Church. Likewise, when a nun takes her final vows she marries our Lord. To reverse either would be paramount to homosexuality.
    Also, the Church has always been a leader in creating hospitals, schools and nursing homes. They have almost exclusively been started and run by women. Not to mention the largest religious media outlet in the world, EWTN. I think it’s because women are not only, first and foremost, nurturers but also because of their administrative skills.
    I don’t know why God gave us the roles that he did but I know that He doesn’t make mistakes.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here