The Shroud of Turin
A new study suggests that one of Christianity's most prized but mysterious relics - the Turin Shroud - is not a medieval forgery and could be the burial robe of Christ.

A new study suggests that one of Christianity’s most prized but mysterious relics – the Turin Shroud – is not a medieval forgery and could be the burial robe of Christ.

Italian scientists conducted a series of experiments that they said showed that the marks on the shroud – purportedly left by the imprint of Christ’s body – could not have been faked with technology that was available in medieval times.

Skeptics have long claimed that the 14ft-long cloth is a forgery. Radiocarbon testing conducted by laboratories in Oxford, Zurich and Arizona in 1988 appeared to back up the theory, suggesting that it dated from between 1260 and 1390. But those tests were in turn disputed on the basis that they were contaminated by fibres from cloth that was used to repair the relic when it was damaged by fire in the Middle Ages.

The new study is the latest intriguing piece of a puzzle that has baffled scientists for centuries and spawned an industry of research, books and documentaries.

“The double image (front and back) of a scourged and crucified man, barely visible on the linen cloth of the Shroud of Turin, has many physical and chemical characteristics that are so particular that the staining  is impossible to obtain in a laboratory,” concluded experts from Italy’s National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development.

The scientists set out to “identify the physical and chemical processes capable of generating a colour similar to that of the image on the shroud”. They concluded that the shade, texture and depth of the imprints on the cloth could be produced only with the aid of ultraviolet lasers producing extremely brief pulses of light.

They said the image of the bearded man must therefore have been created by “some form of electromagnetic energy (such as a flash of light at short wavelength)”.

Although they stopped short of offering a non-scientific explanation for the phenomenon, their findings will be embraced by those who believe that the marks on the shroud were miraculously created at the moment of Christ’s Resurrection.

“We are not at the conclusion. We are composing pieces of a fascinating and complex scientific puzzle,” the team reported.

Prof Paolo Di Lazzaro, who led the research, said: “When one talks about a flash of light being able to colour a piece of linen in the same way as the shroud, discussion inevitably touches on things such as miracles and resurrection. But as scientists, we were concerned only with verifiable scientific processes.

“We hope our results can open up a philosophical and theological debate but we will leave the conclusions to the experts, and ultimately to the conscience of individuals.”

The research backs up the outcome of tests between 1978 and 1981 carried out by a group of American scientists who called themselves the Shroud of Turin Research Project.

They conducted 120 hours of X-rays and ultraviolet light tests and concluded that the marks were not made by paints, pigments or dyes and that the image was not “the product of an artist”, but that at the same time it could not be explained by modern science.

One of Christianity’s greatest objects of veneration, the shroud shows the imprint of a man whose body appears to have nail wounds to his wrists and feet, pinpricks from thorns around his forehead and a spear wound to his chest. Each year it attracts millions of pilgrims to Turin cathedral, where it is kept in a climate-controlled case.

The Vatican has never said whether it believes the shroud to be authentic or not, although the Pope said the image “reminds us always” of Christ’s suffering.

© Copyright (c) The Daily Telegraph

Original Article:

Get our inspiring content delivered to your inbox every morning - FREE!


  1. You really make it appear really easy along with your presentation however I find this topic to be actually one thing which I feel I’d by no means understand. It kind of feels too complicated and very vast for me. I’m looking forward in your next submit, I will attempt to get the hang of it!

  2. The shroud of Turin was never fake from the beginning this proves that the resurrection of Christ is for real. Praise the Lord for the awesome truth!

  3. I respectfully submit that the technology required to produce the image on the shroud, as indicated in current research (i.e. brief pulse u-v laser), has NEVER existed in human history and DOESN’T exist even now.

    I do wish, however, that those in charge of the keeping of this holy relic would reconsider using a piece of the shroud that represents the unrepaired and original cloth material in order to more properly date the relic. I believe that this will indicate a much more ancient date as calculations on the current C-14 data already gathered hint at now.

    That scientists were allowed to use a piece near a burned and repaired area was flawed from the outset and only served to provide further confusion.

    That being said, as a scientist, I clearly understand the miraculous and mysterious nature of this unique object, and I hope one day to see it in Turin.

    This mystery helped bring me to the true Faith and to our beloved Church. As a Catholic, I see the author of this mystery at every Mass.

    Thanks be to God!

    Again, I emphasize, the technology to create this mysterious object has not, and does not now exist on a scale to produce such a large image on a cloth medium.

    And further, to create such a complex image would take computing power that does not yet exist, applied to a machine that has never been built.

    It’s not just the science involved, it’s the engineering and use of that science.

    That is simply stunning.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here